Connecticut Education Law: Protecting Students and Educators
Schools are not always the partners families expect them to be. IEPs get watered down. Discipline gets handed out without due process. Bullying gets ignored. Teachers get pushed out without proper procedure.
When that happens, Connecticut and federal law put real tools in your hands. You just need someone who knows how to use them.
Maya Murphy, P.C. represents families and educators across Connecticut in special education, school discipline, civil rights, placement disputes, and teacher employment matters. We work in every Connecticut school district and at every level of the system, from the IEP meeting to the federal courtroom.
This page explains what Connecticut and federal education law actually covers, who has rights, and how those rights are enforced.
What Education Law Covers
Education law sits at the intersection of federal civil rights statutes, IDEA, and the Connecticut General Statutes.
Federal laws that protect students
- Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 USC § 1400 et seq.
- Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 USC § 794
- Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 USC § 12101 et seq.
- Title VI of the Civil Rights Act (race, color, national origin)
- Title IX (sex discrimination), 20 USC § 1681
- Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 USC § 1232g
- Equal Protection and Due Process under the 14th Amendment
Connecticut statutes that go further
- CGS § 10-76a through § 10-76ii (special education framework)
- CGS § 10-233a through § 10-233h (student discipline)
- CGS § 10-222d (bullying and safe school climate)
- CGS § 10-15c (nondiscrimination in public schools)
- CGS § 10-145a through § 10-145d (teacher certification)
- CGS § 10-151 (tenure and termination procedures)
- RCSA §§ 10-76a-1 through 10-76l-1 (state special education regulations)
Special Education Under IDEA
IDEA guarantees every eligible child with a disability a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) in the Least Restrictive Environment.
Who qualifies
A child qualifies for special education if both:
- The child has one of 13 federal disability categories (autism, learning disability, emotional disturbance, intellectual disability, other health impairment, and others)
- The disability adversely affects educational performance and the child needs specialized instruction
The Child Find duty
Under CGS § 10-76ff and 34 CFR § 300.111, districts have an affirmative duty to identify, locate, and evaluate every child suspected of having a disability. The duty applies even if the child is performing well academically. See our Child Find page for more.
The PPT and the IEP
In Connecticut, the team that develops the IEP is called the Planning and Placement Team (PPT). It must include:
- The parents
- At least one general education teacher
- At least one special education teacher
- A district representative with authority to commit resources
- Someone who can interpret evaluation results
- The student when appropriate
The IEP must include measurable annual goals, services and supports, placement, and how progress will be measured.
For the full process see our IEP Process and Parent Rights in Special Education pages.
504 Plans and Section 504
Section 504 protects students with disabilities even when they do not qualify for an IEP.
Who is covered
- Any student with a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity
- Broader eligibility than IDEA
- Common conditions: ADHD, anxiety, diabetes, food allergies, asthma, chronic illness
What a 504 Plan provides
- Accommodations (extended time, preferential seating, modified assignments)
- Auxiliary aids and services
- Access to school programs, activities, and facilities
- Protection from discrimination
For more, see our 504 Plans in Connecticut and Section 504 Discrimination pages.
Due Process Hearings
When parents and districts cannot agree on special education, IDEA provides a formal hearing process.
What can be challenged
- Identification and eligibility decisions
- Evaluations
- Educational placement
- Provision of FAPE
- IEP content and implementation
The Connecticut process
Governed by CGS § 10-76h and RCSA §§ 10-76h-1 through 10-76h-18:
- Parent or district files a due process complaint
- Mandatory 30-day resolution period (unless waived)
- Optional mediation through the Connecticut State Department of Education
- Impartial hearing officer appointed
- Prehearing conference
- Document and witness disclosure 5 business days before hearing
- Hearing conducted, decision issued within the 45-day federal timeline (34 CFR § 300.515)
- Right to appeal to state or federal court
Connecticut’s burden of proof rule
This is one of the most important things to understand about Connecticut due process. Under RCSA § 10-76h-14, the school district has the burden of proving the appropriateness of its program or placement. Even when the parent files the case.
Most states put that burden on parents under Schaffer v. Weast, 546 U.S. 49 (2005). Connecticut keeps it on the district. This is a significant procedural advantage. See our Due Process Hearings page for more.
Student Discipline
Connecticut students have specific procedural rights when facing suspension or expulsion under CGS § 10-233a through § 10-233h.
Suspension rights
- Out-of-school suspensions limited to 10 consecutive school days, 50 total per year
- Notice and informal hearing required before suspension (CGS § 10-233c)
- The student gets to tell their side
- Schools must consider in-school alternatives where appropriate
Expulsion rights
Under CGS § 10-233d, expulsion (removal for more than 10 days) requires:
- Written notice of the charges
- Formal hearing before the board of education or impartial hearing officer
- The right to counsel
- The right to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses
- A decision based on evidence in the record
- Written findings
- Appeal rights
Special protection for students with disabilities
If the student has an IEP or 504 Plan and faces removal for more than 10 days, the school must conduct a Manifestation Determination Review (MDR) under 20 USC § 1415(k) and 34 CFR § 300.530.
If the conduct was caused by or substantially related to the disability, or by the school’s failure to implement the IEP, the school cannot expel the student. See our pages on Student Discipline Defense, Expulsion Hearings, and Manifestation Determination Review.
Bullying and Harassment
Connecticut has one of the strongest anti-bullying statutes in the country.
Under CGS § 10-222d, districts must
- Adopt a safe school climate plan
- Designate a safe school climate specialist at each school
- Investigate reports within one school day
- Issue written findings to parents within 48 hours of the investigation
- Address cyberbullying that affects the school environment
- Provide intervention services
When bullying becomes a civil rights case
Bullying based on protected characteristics can trigger federal civil rights enforcement:
- Race, color, or national origin (Title VI)
- Sex (Title IX)
- Disability (Section 504 and ADA)
For more, see our School Bullying and School Harassment and Hostile Environment pages.
Discrimination and Title IX
Federal civil rights laws protect students from discrimination in any public or federally funded school.
What Title IX covers
Title IX (20 USC § 1681) prohibits sex discrimination. The 2020 regulations are currently in effect after a federal court vacated the 2024 Final Rule on January 9, 2025. Schools must:
- Designate a Title IX Coordinator
- Respond to actual knowledge of sexual harassment that is severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive
- Use a formal grievance process
- Provide live hearings with cross-examination at the postsecondary level
- Prohibit the single-investigator model
- Protect against retaliation
Disability discrimination
Section 504 and the ADA prohibit discrimination based on disability in any program receiving federal funds. The Supreme Court in A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, 605 U.S. 335 (2025), clarified the standard for student disability discrimination claims.
For more, see our pages on Title IX, School Discrimination, and Section 504 Discrimination.
School Placement Disputes
When the local district cannot provide what a child needs, placement disputes follow.
The Least Restrictive Environment principle
Under IDEA, students must be educated with non-disabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate. But “appropriate” matters. A more restrictive setting is warranted when the child cannot make meaningful progress in a less restrictive one.
Common placement disputes
- Out-of-district placement to a state-approved special education program
- Therapeutic day school
- Residential placement
- Private school reimbursement under Florence County School Dist. Four v. Carter, 510 U.S. 7 (1993)
- Stay-put placement during disputes
Tuition reimbursement
If you give the district written notice of intent to enroll privately and seek reimbursement, and the district has failed to provide FAPE, you may be entitled to private school tuition. See our School Placement Disputes page.
FERPA and School Records
Under FERPA (20 USC § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99), parents have rights to their child’s education records:
- Inspect and review records (district has up to 45 days to respond)
- Request corrections of inaccurate or misleading content
- Consent to most disclosures of personally identifiable information
- Hearing rights to challenge contested content
- File complaints with the U.S. Department of Education
When the student turns 18 or enters postsecondary education, FERPA rights transfer to the student. See our School Records and FERPA page.
Teacher and Educator Rights
We also represent teachers, administrators, and other school staff.
Tenure and termination under CGS § 10-151
- Written notice of intent to terminate stating reasons
- Right to request a hearing
- Hearing before the board or impartial panel
- Right to counsel
- Right to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses
- Statutory grounds required
- Appeal to Superior Court
Certification matters
- Certification denial proceedings
- Certification revocation under CGS § 10-145b
- Hearing rights before the State Board of Education
- Administrative appeal under the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act
Investigation defense
- Internal district investigations
- Department of Children and Families involvement
- Mandatory reporter issues
- Allegations of misconduct
For more, see our Teacher Misconduct page.
How Maya Murphy Helps
Our education law practice is built around five things:
- Pre-IEP and pre-PPT preparation so you walk into meetings ready
- Aggressive enforcement of FAPE, Section 504, and Title IX rights
- Discipline defense at every level, from informal suspension hearings through expulsion appeals
- Due process litigation when negotiation has failed
- Teacher and educator defense in tenure, certification, and misconduct matters
We serve clients across Connecticut, with deep roots in Westport, Greenwich, Stamford, Norwalk, Darien, Fairfield, New Haven, and Hartford.
Ready to Talk to a Connecticut Education Lawyer?
Education disputes do not get easier with time. Most have strict deadlines. The earlier you have legal help, the more options you have.
- Confidential initial consultation
- Honest evaluation of your case
- Pre-PPT preparation and representation
- Discipline defense and expulsion hearings
- Due process and federal court litigation
- Teacher and educator defense
Call us at (203) 221-3100. Or contact us through the form on this page.






