Posts tagged with "drunk driving accident"

Failure to Warn Case Against Generic Ibuprofen

A federal appeals court has reinstated a lawsuit against the maker of a generic brand of ibuprofen. The lawsuit is on behalf of a child who suffered liver damage after taking the drug as prescribed after surgery. The case holds generic drug makers to the same labeling standard as makers of patented drugs. The case alleges failure to warn of ibuprofen risks by the drug maker. The court says the duty to warn applies to generic drug makers.

Drug Label Failed to Warn of Known Risk

Ibuprofen is a popular over-the-counter painkiller. The lawsuit says the drug is known to cause liver failure under some circumstances. The label contained no warnings about this potential side effect.

In 2009 the Supreme Court ruled drug makers can be sued for failing to warn of the risks of a medication even though the FDA has approved package or label warnings. This ruling makes clear the same standard applies to makers of the generic forms of the drug. Failure to warn is one of the main theories of product liability law.

By now everyone should be clear on the risks of liver damage associated with the two common aspirin alternatives. The FDA instructed drug makers to limit the amount of acetaminophen in prescription painkillers like oxycodone and hydrocodone. As this case shows, what you don’t know can hurt you.

By: Arthur Buono

If you have any questions relating to a personal injury claim or would like to schedule a free consultation, please contact Joseph Maya and the other experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

‘Distracted Doctoring’ a Danger to Patients

Distractions From Patient Care

A survey found that 55 percent of technicians monitoring bypass machines admitted to talking on cell phones during surgery. Half admitted to texting while in surgery. A widely read editorial in Anesthesiology News by Peter J. Papadakos, MD, says health care workers today are “fixated on computer screens” and rarely receive information directly from their patients. Papadakos referred to a study presented to the American Society of Anesthesiologists this year that said nurse anesthetists and residents were distracted by something other than patient care in 54 percent of cases. The study further cited surfing the Internet as the primary distraction. All of these distractions serve as a potential danger to patients.

Additionally, a report in The New York Times cited polls of medical professionals in which a majority of respondents admitted using cellphones during critical procedures. The Times cited a survey of medical technicians published in Perfusion, a journal about cardio-pulmonary bypass surgery, which found that 55 percent of technicians who monitor bypass machines acknowledged talking on cell phones during heart surgery and half said they had texted while in surgery.

“Why does anyone carry a cell phone into an operating room?” Patrick A. Salvi, managing equity partner of Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard P.C. in Chicago, asked. “The patient on the table deserves the undivided attention of everyone in that room.”

Malpractice of Healthcare Workers

Salvi, a medical malpractice attorney, expressed concern that healthcare workers’ increased reliance on electronic devices has become a distraction that has led to medical errors and injuries.

“We’re dismayed by reports that say doctors, nurses, technicians and others providing medical care are spending too much time focused on smartphones, computer screens and other devices when they should be paying attention to their patients.” “We’re not against the use of electronic devices for delivery of medical records or even personal communication, but it is absolutely crucial that a focus on the patient is not dropped from the accepted standards of medical care,” said Salvi.

Anyone believing their injuries or the injury or death of a loved one in a hospital or another medical setting may have been caused by medical errors resulting from distraction should contact an experienced medical malpractice attorney immediately.

By: Larry Bodine

If you have any questions relating to a medical malpractice claims, medical negligence or injury, or a personal injury claim or would like to schedule a free consultation, please contact Joseph Maya and the other experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

State Lawmaker Involved in Car Accident Lawsuit Accused of Drunk Driving

A personal injury lawsuit filed this week accuses Connecticut State Rep. Christina Ayala of fleeing the scene of an accident caused by her own drunk driving, according to a report from the Norwich Bulletin.

Sources say the lawsuit, filed by 26-year-old Krystal Valez, claims that Ayala was under the influence of alcohol when she ran her car into a vehicle driven by Valez. The lawsuit also alleges that Ayala fled the scene of the accident.

The accident in question occurred last August, when Ayala’s 2007 Nissan Sentra allegedly struck a 2002 Honda Accord being driven by Valez.

Ayala allegedly fled the scene of the accident, but a person who witnessed the crash followed her car and eventually forced her to pull over about six blocks from the location of the collision, according to sources.

When Ayala was questioned by officers after the accident, she claimed that she tried to check on Valez following the collision, but that she decided to leave the scene because she felt “scared” due to the presence of a man who was screaming at her.

Car Accident Lawsuit

Interestingly, when police took Ayala into custody, they did not test her for alcohol, because they claimed she did not appear to be intoxicated. Nevertheless, the lawsuit filed by Valez alleges that Ayala was drunk at the time of the crash.

The plaintiff claims that she suffered back injuries and a concussion as a result of the accident, and that her medical costs amount to roughly $11,000.

Valez, however, will have to refute the testimony of Ayala’s father, Alberto Ayala, who claims that his daughter had not been drinking before the accident, according a statement given to the Connecticut Post.

Of course, Alberto Ayala has every incentive to make this claim, because not only is he the driver’s father, he is also named as a defendant in the car accident lawsuit.

Unfortunately for Christina Ayala, a native of Bridgeport, Connecticut, the pending personal injury lawsuit is the least of her legal concerns.

Sources say Ayala, who is serving her first term in the state legislature, was officially charged with failing to renew her driver’s registration, failing to obey a traffic signal, and evading responsibility.

During her latest court hearing, Ayala was told by her judge that she could accept a plea bargain offered by prosecutors or stand trial for her criminal counts.

Under the plea deal, Ayala would receive a suspended sentence and have an extended period of probation. Sources say Ayala has three weeks to make her choice.

By JClark, totalinjury.com

If you have any questions relating to a personal injury claim or would like to schedule a free consultation, please contact Joseph Maya and the other experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

Woman Injured in Rail Crash Files Train Accident Lawsuit

A 65-year-old woman who was injured in a dramatic train crash last month in Connecticut has filed a negligence lawsuit against Metro-North Railroad, according to a report from ABC News.

Sources say the woman, Elizabeth Sorenson, a resident of Bridgeport, Connecticut, suffered multiple bone fractures and remains in critical condition as doctors tend to a severe brain injury.

The lawsuit was the first claim filed by a victim of the crash that occurred on May 17. According to sources, the crash injured more than 70 people.

Sorenson’s personal injury attorney told sources that he filed the lawsuit in federal court in order to gain access to witnesses that observed the accident and to allow families of the victims to become involved in the investigation.

Sources expect more lawsuits to eventually be filed in the wake of the massive train accident, which happened at 6:10 p.m. on a weekday as the train carried 300 passengers from New York’s Grand Central Station to New Haven, Connecticut.

The train reportedly derailed near a highway overpass in the town of Bridgeport, and was then struck by a train holding 400 passengers that was headed the opposite direction.

The Damage Caused by the Accident

The damage caused by the accident was “absolutely staggering,” according to Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal, as he observed the scene. Sources say parts of the roof of some of the train cars had been torn off, and that some of the tracks were noticeably twisted.

Three people remain in critical condition after the accident, and the National Transportation Safety Board has launched a full investigation into the wreck.

Thus far, investigators have yet to isolate the cause of the accident, but the impact was so severe, some passengers initially thought it may have been caused by a bomb.

“We came to a sudden halt. We were jerked. There was smoke. People were screaming; people were really nervous. We were pretty shaken up. They had to smash a window to get us out,” said one passenger traveling from New York.

Another passenger told local sources that they “went flying” and reported that “one entire compartment was completely ripped open.”

Most of the 70 passengers who were injured received prompt treatment at the site of the accident, but three victims are still in critical condition, according to reports.

According to report from train officials, the tracks involved in the collision suffered “extensive infrastructure damage,” and the train involved in the accident will “need to be removed by crane” following a thorough investigation.

By JClark, totalinjury.com

If you have any questions relating to a personal injury claim or would like to schedule a free consultation, please contact Joseph Maya and the other experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

$825,000 Verdict for Injuries from Truck Accident

In a personal injury trial in the Stamford Superior Court a woman received $825,000 for injuries to her head and neck suffered in a collision with a large truck.

Case Details

The case involved a motor vehicle accident whereby, the plaintiff, Mrs. Hutter, was hit from behind by a large beer truck owned by DiChello Distributors. As a result of the collision, Mrs. Hutter sustained a number of serious injuries including injuries to her head and neck. She also sustained a mild traumatic brain injury.

During the course of a three week trial, the plaintiff presented a substantial number of witnesses to establish the significance of the impact and the extent of the injuries. The experts included an accident reconstruction expert from Maryland, a bio-mechanical expert from Virginia, a neurologist, a psychiatrist and a neuropsychologist.

In addition to the various expert witness, Mrs. Hutter also presented testimony from her friends who knew her before the time of the accident and were able to explain to the jury the significant change in Mrs. Hutter that occurred as a result of the incident.

The Verdict

After three weeks of evidence, the jury deliberated for two and one-half days and then rendered a verdict in favor of Mrs. Hutter in the amount of $825,000 including over $500,000 for compensation for her pain and suffering.

If you have any questions relating to a personal injury claim or would like to schedule a consultation, please contact Joseph Maya and the other experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

Medical Devices Hurting Kids

Medical Devices –  from contact lenses to insulin pumps – injure about 70,000 children each year in the United States. A study published in the journal Pediatrics Monday is the first to compile data on the injuries. The increasing use of medical devices designed for adults in children concerns researchers.

  • A groundbreaking study of hospital admissions estimates over 70,000 injuries yearly
  • Many injuries linked to improper handling or care of medical devices by patients
  • Concerns over pediatric use of adult devices
Many Injuries Preventable, Some Tradeoffs Made

Contact lenses caused one-quarter of the injuries counted. Many of these were minor infections or scratches caused by kids failing to clean their contacts carefully or wearing them too long. Devices also caused some serious injuries. Some devices allow children to be treated at home instead of in the hospital. Sometimes parents lack the skill or knowledge to handle the devices properly. The idea that some of the injuries may be the result of adult devices being used in children raises questions of defective design by manufacturers and malpractice by caregivers.

As doctors and healthcare use medical devices more frequently to treat patients, litigation over injures the devices cause also increases. Very often the litigation takes the form of a class action. In a class action, the claims of numerous people who’ve been injured by the same device or drug are combined in one lawsuit. Injured persons may choose to join the lawsuit or go it alone.

Class actions involving persons injured by medical devices will involve some form of a product liability claim. Individual claims relating to devices might also involve a theory of medical malpractice or negligence. The increase in malpractice and products liability cases continues to stoke the health care and tort reform debate.

By: Arthur Buono

If you have any questions relating to a medical malpractice claim, medical injury, personal injury claim or would like to schedule a free consultation, please contact Joseph Maya and the other experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or JMaya@Mayalaw.com to schedule a consultation today.

Stop and Shop Slip and Fall Recovers $537,787 Against Attorney

Bell v. Law Offices of Howard A. Lawrence, LLC, NNHCV116025442S, 2013 WL 1943849 (Conn. Super. Ct. Apr. 19, 2013)

In a Connecticut Superior Court decision, Norma Bell recovered $537,787 in damages stemming from a fall at Stop and Shop Supermarket. The plaintiff’s award was against her former attorney in her personal injury action against Stop and Shop, who had failed to appeal Stop and Shop’s Motion to Dismiss.[1]

Case Background

On August 25, 2006, Norma Bell, when exiting from the Stop and Shop Supermarket located at 100 Division Street in Ansonia, fell due to the dangerous and defective condition of the parking area next to the store provided for use by its patrons.[2]  Stop and Shop, although not the owner of the parking area, would have the duty to use reasonable care to maintain the said area in a reasonably safe condition to which its patrons were invited to use.

As a result of her fall, the plaintiff sustained serious and permanent personal injuries including a serious cerebral concussion, frontal sinus dehiscence requiring craniotomy.[3]  Bell retained Howard A. Lawrence to represent her in connection with a claim for monetary compensation.

Bell’s attorney, Lawrence, filed suit against Stop and Shop only.  However, the lease agreement between Stop and Shop and the owner of the parking lot provided the lot owner was responsible for maintenance.  Bell’s attorney failed to include the owner of the parking in the action and after the court granted Stop and Shop’s Motion To Dismiss, Lawrence failed to appeal.

In the subsequent legal malpractice lawsuit against the Law Offices of Howard A. Lawrence, Bell won a judgment of $537,787.41 ($187,781.41 in economic damages and $350,000 for noneconomic damages) representing her damages for the “lost cause” against Stop and Shop.[4]

At Maya Murphy, P.C., our experienced team of personal injury attorneys is dedicated to achieving the best results for individuals and their families and loved ones whose daily lives have been disrupted by injury.  Our personal injury attorneys assist clients in New York, Bridgeport, Darien, Fairfield, Greenwich, New Canaan, Norwalk, Stamford, Westport, and throughout Fairfield County.

If you have any questions relating to a personal injury claim or attorney malpractice claim or would like to schedule a free consultation, please contact Joseph Maya and the other experienced attorneys at our Westport office by phone at (203) 221-3100 or via e-mail at JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

$13 Million For Victim Paralyzed in Texting While Driving Accident

A driver in Alabama who was paralyzed from the chest down after being rear-ended on a highway was awarded $13 million in compensatory damages last month. Phone records show that the defendant driving the other vehicle was sending text messages around the time of the accident.

He’ll Never Walk Again

Miguel Gutierrez was a migrant worker from Mexico, armed with a green card and driving through the South looking for work. In February 2010, on his way from Florida to Montgomery, Alabama to pick up a new job, Gutierrez was abruptly hit from behind on the highway just as he entered the city, shattering two of his vertebrae and leaving him with no motor functions below his chest.

“He’s a 53-year-old guy who just loved to work,” says Gutierrez’s attorney, Keith Belt. “Now he’ll never walk again.”

During the trial, defendant Lisa Franklin argued that Gutierrez had actually caused the accident. “Basically, it was a he-said-she-said,” Belt says. “She claimed that my client pulled right out in front of her from a gas station. My client said he had been driving in that lane for over a mile and just got hit from behind. One of them was not telling the truth. It’s pretty obvious who the jury believed.”

Both sides brought in experts to recreate the accident scene for the jury, with conflicting accounts of how the events went down. However, Franklin’s testimony brought up questions of consistency.

“She basically said she didn’t see my client until a second before impact. She didn’t stop, didn’t even drop a skid,” Belt says. “The question she could never answer, based on the visibility of the accident scene, was how she couldn’t explain how she didn’t see him until one second before.”

Truth Found in Phone Records

The answer may have been found in Franklin’s phone bill. According to the records, she had both sent and received a text message within a two-minute window around the time the accident took place. “That gave an explanation to the jury for why she never saw him,” says Belt. “She was certainly not paying attention.”

The phone bill was enough for the jury, who handed Gutierrez a $13 million award, all compensatory for his past and future medical bills and other losses.

Unfortunately Gutierrez is far from alone as a victim injured by a driver texting while driving. According to the National Safety Council, 23 percent of car crashes, or 1.3 million per year, are caused by phone calls or texting. Phone use was involved in 3,092 highway deaths in 2010, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates.

While laws against distracted driving have proliferated in the last five years, some states still have no such measure in place

By: Aaron Kase

At Maya Murphy, P.C., our experienced team of personal injury attorneys is dedicated to achieving the best results for individuals and their families and loved ones whose daily lives have been disrupted by injury.  Our personal injury attorneys assist clients in New York, Bridgeport, Darien, Fairfield, Greenwich, New Canaan, Norwalk, Stamford, Westport, and throughout Fairfield County.

If you have any questions relating to a motor vehicle accident, driving laws, or a personal injury claim or would like to schedule a free consultation, please contact Joseph Maya and the other experienced attorneys at our Westport office by phone at (203) 221-3100 or via e-mail at JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

$178 Million Jury Award for Botched Gastric Bypass

A Serious Complication

At 38 years old, Clay Chandler stood 6’2” and weighed around 375 pounds. The father of two and veteran of the Clay County Sheriff’s Office in Florida always passed his physicals, but when he learned about the prestigious and nationally accredited gastric bypass program at Memorial Hospital, he decided to give it a try to shed some of the pounds.

During the 2007 surgery, doctors opened his abdominal cavity and reduced the size of his stomach, while arranging for food to bypass part of his small intestine. The idea is, the patient will eat less and absorb less of what he does eat, leading to weight loss. Unfortunately, in Chandler’s case, the surgery also led to an anastomotic leak, with fluids seeping out of his gastrointestinal tract. Though Chandler displayed classic symptoms of a leak, including difficulty breathing, he was left in critical care for eight days before doctors went in to diagnose and fix the problem.

By then, it was too late, and Chandler went into cardiac arrest and septic shock, suffered severe brain damage, and spent over two weeks in a coma. He emerged from the coma permanently mentally and physically disabled, in need of round-the-clock care, and unable to perform even the most basic life functions on his own.

Nationally Accredited Program

The extent of the neglect is shocking, says Chandler’s lawyer, Jacksonville-based attorney Tom Edwards. “A leak is a very serious complication that can kill the patient,” Edwards explains. “Unless you can definitely rule out a leak, you’re supposed to go back in and resew it.”

The hospital was obviously aware of the dangers. Memorial had received a “Bariatric Center of Excellence” certificate, and advertised that their facilities “must meet stringent quality criteria, as established by expert physician panels, surgeons, behaviorists, and nutritionists.” However, during testimony, Memorial CEO James Wood repeatedly admitted that the hospital hadn’t followed basic peer review policies designed to ensure patient safety. What’s more, John Deperi, the doctor in charge of Chandler’s care, was not actually certified to perform the surgery.

As if that weren’t enough, while Chandler was in a coma, he was again neglected, suffering from bedsores, frozen joints and ultimately was blinded when eye drops were not administered with any regularity. “He’s a total care patient for the rest of his life,” Edwards says. “He needs to be bathed, he can’t use his arms or hands to pull his blanket up if he gets cold, and can’t scratch his nose without help.” A jury heard enough and awarded Chandler, his wife, and two teenage children a total of $178 million for liability and punitive damages.

History of Fraud

Chandler may not be the only patient injured by the hospital’s negligence. A former Memorial nurse testified during the trial that the hospital had ignored her complaints of serious patient care issues for years. “Patients who have had problems need to look at who was doing surgery, and whether the hospital followed the guidelines they represented to the public they were following,” Edwards says.

Memorial Hospital is part of Hospital Corporation of America (HCA), a massive network comprised of 163 hospitals and another 109 freestanding surgery centers in the United States and Britain which calls itself the “nation’s leading provider of healthcare services.” However, this isn’t the first time the corporate giant has found itself on the wrong end of a fraud case. Over two settlements in 2000 and 2002, HCA paid out $1.7 billion to the United States government after running massive Medicare and Medicaid scams in the 1990s.

As a result of the suit, the healthcare company operated from 2000 to 2009 under a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services mandating strict ethics and compliance measures. Was the agreement effective? The fraud documented in Chandler’s case, in which the hospital did not meet their own advertised standards of care and certification, came in 2007 when the agreement was ostensibly still in place.

“Things Were Done Appropriately”

“I sure hope Memorial Hospital and HCA have learned their lesson,” Edwards says. “They had a good program in place in writing. They simply were cutting corners and not following their own policies. If they were following good safety procedures, this never would have happened.”

What measures for improving the hospital plans to take following the jury ruling is unclear. The hospital issued a statement indicating it plans to appeal, and in a brief interview after the award was announced, Memorial CEO James Wood told a television reporter, “We feel like things were done appropriately. The verdict was a surprise,” before getting in his car and driving away.

“He said that to the news media, but his sworn testimony before the jury would seem to contradict it,” Edwards noted.

By: Aaron Krase

At Maya Murphy, P.C., our experienced team of personal injury attorneys is dedicated to achieving the best results for individuals and their families and loved ones whose daily lives have been disrupted by injury.  Our personal injury attorneys assist clients in New York, Bridgeport, Darien, Fairfield, Greenwich, New Canaan, Norwalk, Stamford, Westport, and throughout Fairfield County.

If you have any questions relating to a medical malpractice claim, hospital negligence, or a personal injury claim or would like to schedule a free consultation, please contact Joseph Maya and the other experienced attorneys at our Westport office by phone at (203) 221-3100 or via e-mail at JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

Unplanned Pregnancy, Wrongful Conception and Wrongful Birth

A Georgia woman has filed a $5 million wrongful pregnancy lawsuit against Qualitest Pharmaceuticals. She claims she became pregnant despite taking her birth control pills in the packaging sequence. Of course, Qualitest has recalled a number of brands and lots of the pills because they were packaged in the incorrect sequence for effective contraception.

The woman’s asking for damages for pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, health care and treatment, loss of earnings, and a loss of ability to earn money.

The lawsuit seeks class-action status for all women who’ve become pregnant because of this product defect.

Qualitest Pharmaceuticals recalled several brands of oral contraceptives because they posed a risk of unplanned pregnancy. The drug itself is not defective, but a packaging mistake could lead to a woman taking the pills out of sequence. In that case, contraception would be ineffective, and a woman could become pregnant unintentionally.

Not All States Permit Claims for Wrongful Birth or Pregnancy

A packaging error can make a product defective. For example, the failure to warn of harmful side effects or to instruct in the safe or proper use of the product can serve as grounds for a lawsuit if a consumer is harmed by the failure. The mistake might also be a breach of warranty. So if an unplanned pregnancy can be considered “harm” a consumer could sue for this result.

About half the states permit lawsuits for what’s known as “wrongful birth.” It’s a controversial concept. The idea is that had the parents of a child known it would be born with a serious birth defect or condition, they would have terminated the pregnancy. Similarly, parents, if informed that a pregnancy carried the risk of defect, like a genetic disease, may have avoided conceiving altogether.

For example, a jury recently awarded the parents of a child born with no arms and one leg $4.5 million. The award is to compensate them for the expenses of caring for their child over his lifetime. The parents sued the ob/gyn who failed to observe the deformities in two sonograms. They also settled separate claims against a hospital whose technicians likewise failed to detect the abnormalities.

In the United States, unplanned pregnancies are as much the rule as the exception. According to the Centers for Disease Control, as many as half of US pregnancies are unplanned. Could someone besides the parents be legally liable for the consequences of an unintended pregnancy?

Sure enough, some states allow lawsuits for a “wrongful” pregnancy that results in a normal birth. The “wrongful” part can be a defective sterilization, like vasectomy or tubal ligation, or defective contraception. Damages are limited, however. They include the pain and suffering of pregnancy and labor, the costs of medical care for the same, and the costs of the failed procedure or contraceptive device. They exclude the costs of rearing a child.

Wrongful Contraception

This brings us back to the Qualitest recall. If a woman became pregnant as a result of the ineffectiveness of an oral contraceptive, she might have a cause of action for wrongful pregnancy. I asked attorney Tom Lamb, who authors the Drug Injury Watch blog, about it.

Lamb has been involved in numerous product liability cases involving adverse side effects from oral contraception. “Wrongful pregnancy, like wrongful birth, is a state-by-state matter,” he said. “So the first issue is, does the state permit these types of claims.”

Being allowed to sue and actually having a case are two different things, Lamb continues. “You’re likely to have several problems of proof. In the first place, all contraceptives carry some risk of pregnancy. They’re not 100 percent effective. Then there are likely to be questions about whether the contraceptives were used correctly.”

Lamb also notes that a Supreme Court decision from last June has seriously affected suits against generic drug makers. “The Mensing decision put a roadblock in front of failure to warn cases against generic drugmakers. So now whether you have any case at all may come down to whether your doctor prescribed you the ‘name brand’ or generic version of the drug that harmed you.”

That’s something even Justice Thomas, who wrote the opinion in the case, called unfair. Most people, including Lamb, agree. “Hopefully,” he said, “Congress will realize this and find the time to fix the law.”

By: Art Buono

At Maya Murphy, P.C., our experienced team of personal injury attorneys is dedicated to achieving the best results for individuals and their families and loved ones whose daily lives have been disrupted by injury.  Our personal injury attorneys assist clients in New York, Bridgeport, Darien, Fairfield, Greenwich, New Canaan, Norwalk, Stamford, Westport, and throughout Fairfield County.

If you have any questions relating to a products liability claim, bad drug or medical error claim, or personal injury claim or would like to schedule a free consultation, please contact Joseph Maya and the other experienced attorneys at our Westport office by phone at (203) 221-3100 or via e-mail at JMaya@Mayalaw.com.