Posts tagged with "wealth planning"

Utilizing Valuation Discounts for Gift Tax Savings: The Family LLC

This memorandum discusses the advantages of using gifts of fractional ownership interests in a family limited liability company (“LLC”) to defer or reduce gift and estate taxes. A family limited liability company can be used as an estate planning tool to “leverage” gifts to the next generation. The leverage is created by valuation discounts that apply to gifts of interests in a family LLC.

For gift tax purposes, the value used in determining the amount of a gift is fair market value, generally defined as the price at which the property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or to sell and both having reasonable knowledge of the facts. Ownership of an interest in an entity such as a family LLC, whether a majority or minority interest, generally will result in a lower valuation for estate and gift tax purposes than the outright ownership of assets outside of the entity. Lower valuations result because minority interest and lack of marketability valuation discounts are allowed for transfers of interests in closely held corporations and limited partnerships.

A minority interest is any ownership interest in an entity such as a family LLC that lacks voting control over the entity, such that the member has no unilateral power to determine the timing of distributions, to force a liquidation of the LLC, or to control the management of the LLC. A marketability discount generally applies to majority and minority interests in a LLC due to the illiquid nature of such interests. A combined marketability and minority interest discount may approach fifty percent.

The following example illustrates the advantages of utilizing valuation discounts
in gifts of Family LLC interests:

Suppose Mom and Dad own real estate worth $1,000,000.00. They wish to make partial gifts of this real estate to their four children to take advantage of the $13,000.00 annual exclusion under Internal Revenue Code § 2503(a). Mom and Dad decide to establish a family LLC to own the real estate. Each receives a 50% interest in the LLC upon contribution of the real estate to the LLC. Mom and Dad are appointed managers, which gives them the power to make all decisions regarding the management and operation of the LLC. After establishing the LLC for substantial business reasons, and after the LLC has been in existence for some time, Mom and Dad make a gift of 19.2% of their interests in the LLC, by giving a 4.8% interest to each of their four children.

Each gift of an interest in the LLC is entitled to a minority interest discount, because each child lacks control of the entity. Each gift is also entitled to a lack of marketability discount because each interest in the LLC is highly illiquid, and no child has the power to liquidate the LLC. Assuming for purposes of this example a total discount of fifty percent, the fair market value of the 4.8% gift made to each child is only $24,000.00, even though 4.8% of the underlying assets in the LLC is $48,000.00. Thus, the gift tax exclusion has been “leveraged” using the LLC because $48,000.00 in underlying asset value has been transferred to each child without gift tax cost and without using any unified credit.

As the real estate owned by the LLC increases in value, such increase in value
will be reflected in Mom’s and Dad’s estates only to the extent of their remaining interest in the LLC. Furthermore, after the gifts Mom and Dad each owns only a 40.4% minority interest in the LLC. Each such interest lacks the power to liquidate the LLC, and would also be entitled to minority interest and lack of marketability discounts. Thus, significant gift and estate tax savings can be achieved by using a family LLC, although at the “cost” to Mom and Dad of foregoing the income that otherwise would have been received on the 19.2% that has been given away to the children.

Because of many recent court cases involving the use of family limited liability companies and family limited partnerships, a careful analysis in each instance is needed before interests in a family entity are gifted. Moreover, in most situations a professional appraisal is needed to value both the company’s underlying assets and the fair market value of the interests gifted. The cost of such appraisals must be considered when a decision is make to implement the use of family entities as a part of one’s estate plan.

Continue Reading

Rolling GRATs: A Low Risk High Reward Estate Planning Tool

A Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT) can be an effective wealth transfer technique without incurring a gift tax or utilizing one’s lifetime gift tax exemption. A risk, however, with a long-term GRAT is if the Grantor dies prior to the expiration of its term. Death of the Grantor would subject the trust assets, including any income and appreciation, to estate tax. To reduce the mortality risk (especially for elderly clients or for those with health concerns), there is an estate planning technique that utilizes shorter-term GRATs.

The “Rolling GRAT” technique involves creating a series of consecutive short-term GRATs (typically 2 to 3 years) with each successive GRAT funded by the previous trust’s annuity payments. Rolling GRATs minimize the risk of mortality during the term and thereby increases the success of transferring wealth. Two years is the shortest amount allowable by the IRS according to recent revenue rulings. These short-term GRATs can take advantage of asset volatility by capturing rapid appreciation in assets such as a rapid increase in stock value (i.e. Tesla). In fact, research on GRATs funded with publicly traded stock showed that a series of rolling GRATs outperformed an identical long-term GRAT, regardless of the 7520 rate at time of creation. The study showed that the short-term GRAT strategy minimized the risk that good investment performance in one year would be offset by poor performance in another year. Rolling GRATs also keep more funds committed to the estate planning strategy.

If the short-term GRAT strategy is effective (assets appreciate faster than the IRS Section 7520 rate within the trust term), wealth is removed from the taxable estate and transferred to beneficiaries at little cost. If the strategy is not effective (assets did not outperform the IRS Section 7520 rate), all of the assets would go back to the Grantor in form of the annuity payments and none of the lifetime gift tax exemption would be wasted. Thus, almost no risk, but the potential for very high reward.

Rolling GRATs also offer the advantage of plan and strategy flexibility. The Grantor can stop the rolling process at any time and for any reason. For example, the Grantor may wish to stop if he or she needs the income from the trust assets, no longer has an estate tax concern, wants to transfer wealth to the beneficiaries sooner, the assets’ growth rate drops too low, or his or her health has deteriorated and is not expected to live for another 2 or 3 years. The disadvantage of a short-term GRAT is that a particularly low Section 7520 rate will not be locked in long-term.

While Rolling GRATs offer advantages for liquid assets, such as publicly traded stock, illiquid or hard-to-value assets are better suited for long-term GRATs. In particular, illiquid assets would require frequent valuations that may be subjective, cumbersome and costly.
It is important to note that a provision in the President Obama’s 2014 Budget seeks to eliminate the use of short-term GRATs. The proposal would require that any new GRAT have a minimum term of 10 years and would require that the remainder interest have a value greater than zero at the time the interest is created. This minimum 10 year term would not eliminate the use of GRATs, but it would increase the risk that the grantor would fail to outlive the GRAT term and lose the anticipated transfer tax benefit.

Continue Reading